lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <50E793A0.4020702@nvidia.com> Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:14:48 +0530 From: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com> To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> CC: "mturquette@...aro.org" <mturquette@...aro.org>, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>, "grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, "rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>, "maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com" <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>, "linux@...sktech.co.nz" <linux@...sktech.co.nz>, "josh.cartwright@...com" <josh.cartwright@...com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] clk: tegra: Use common of_clk_init() function On Friday 04 January 2013 10:00 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 01/04/2013 12:00 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote: >> Use common of_clk_init() function for clocks initialization. >> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c | 3 ++- >> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c | 3 ++- > Oh, so this series is written assuming that the Tegra CCF rework is > already applied then? That makes the dependencies quite painful, since I > think we'll end up with the following order being needed: > > 1) clk: Add composite clock type > -> This would usually go through the clk tree. > 2) The Tegra CCF rework series > -> This must go through the Tegra tree due to lots of dependencies > and merge conflicts with other Tegra patches. > 3) This series > -> This would usually go through the clk tree. > > Is it possible to re-order the dependencies as (1) (3) (2), so that Mike > can apply (1) and (3) to the clock tree, then I can use the clk tree as > the basis for a branch in the Tegra tree to apply (2) and all the other > Tegra patches that will conflict with (2)? If Mike approves the concept and implementation in (1) and (3) then I will repost (2) and (3) with dependencies re-ordered. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists