[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130104055031.GQ7247@mwanda>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:50:31 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: wwang <wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn>
Cc: "sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"oakad@...oo.com" <oakad@...oo.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "cjb@...top.org" <cjb@...top.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] MFD:rtsx: Declare that the DMA address
limitationis32bit explicitly
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:46:22AM +0800, wwang wrote:
> 于 2013年01月03日 20:25, Dan Carpenter 写道:
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:41:28AM +0800, wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn wrote:
> >> From: Wei WANG <wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn>
> >>
> >> Realtek PCIe card reader only supports 32bit DMA
> >>
> > Is this a bugfix? If so what does the bug look like?
> >
> > regards,
> > dan carpenter
> >
> Hi Dan:
>
> No, this is not a bugfix. In default, the kernel will allocate 32bit
> address for DMA. This declaration can improve the readability.
>
Ah ok. Really none of the things I mentioned were stuff that
prevented the patch from being merged or couldn't be fixed in follow
on patches.
The thing is that the commit message should always say why a patch
is needed.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists