[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC5umyjpA4_J-1RRv0O72GiPW5O6-1b+dypg746vOphEkpKyYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 22:37:13 +0900
From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
To: Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...lsio.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 09/26] infiniband: rename random32() to prandom_u32()
2013/1/5 Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>:
> I'm asking: why are you bothering with renaming the functions? This seems
> like a needless change, _unless_ there are really non-pseudo-random services
> being added.
We already have get_random_byte() which is not pseudo-random number
generator.
Apart from that, the naming scheme was confusing without "prandom" prefix.
Because I introduced new functions in the commit 6582c665 ("prandom:
introduce prandom_bytes() and prandom_bytes_state()").
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists