linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v2 09/26] infiniband: rename random32() to prandom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50E8B85F.9030605@opengridcomputing.com>
Date:	Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:33:51 -0600
From:	Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
To:	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
	Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
	Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
	Steve Wise <swise@...lsio.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 09/26] infiniband: rename random32() to prandom_u32()

On 1/5/2013 7:37 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2013/1/5 Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>:
>> I'm asking: why are you bothering with renaming the functions?  This seems
>> like a needless change, _unless_ there are really non-pseudo-random services
>> being added.
> We already have get_random_byte() which is not pseudo-random number
> generator.
>
> Apart from that, the naming scheme was confusing without "prandom" prefix.
> Because I introduced new functions in the commit 6582c665 ("prandom:
> introduce prandom_bytes() and prandom_bytes_state()").

Ok, thanks for the explanation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/