[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50E795AC.5030106@nvidia.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:23:32 +0530
From: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: "mturquette@...aro.org" <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: tegra30: Convert clk out to composite clk
On Friday 04 January 2013 09:55 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 10:51 PM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
>> Convert clk out to composite clock type which removes
>> the mux clock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> This patch is rebased on ccf-rework for Tegra patch series. It is just to show
>> how clk-composite can be used, not to be merged. If patch 1 is accepted then
>> I would like to merge this patch to ccf-rework series.
> Just so I'm clear, is the intent that patch 1 of this series gets
> reviewed/accepted, and then you'll repost an updated version of the
> Tegra CCF rework series that relies on patch 1? If so, patch 1 would
> need to be either taken through the Tegra tree, or put into a separate
> branch in the clock tree, so the Tegra tree can merge it as a dependency
> of the Tegra CCF rework branch.
Yes, that is my plan but you can tell whatever you are comfortable with.
I will re-order the dependencies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists