linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: Add composite clock type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50EF2D48.2080004@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:06:16 -0800
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>
CC:	"mturquette@...aro.org" <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: Add composite clock type

On 01/04/13 18:49, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> On Saturday 05 January 2013 03:48 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 01/03/13 21:51, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/Makefile b/drivers/clk/Makefile
>>> index f0b269a..baf7608 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/Makefile
>>> @@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
>>>   obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK)        += clk-devres.o
>>>   obj-$(CONFIG_CLKDEV_LOOKUP)    += clkdev.o
>>>   obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)    += clk.o clk-fixed-rate.o clk-gate.o \
>>> -                   clk-mux.o clk-divider.o clk-fixed-factor.o
>>> +                   clk-mux.o clk-divider.o clk-fixed-factor.o \
>>> +                   clk-composite.o
>> This list is getting a little out of hand. Should we sort it
>> alphabetically and put each file on one line?
>
> Do you want me to do it in this patch?
>
>

No.

>>> +static u8 clk_composite_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct clk_composite *composite = to_clk_composite(hw);
>>> +    const struct clk_ops *mux_ops = composite->mux_ops;
>>> +    struct clk_hw *mux_hw = composite->mux_hw;
>>> +
>>> +    mux_hw->clk = hw->clk;
>> Looks like this is already done down in the register function. Why are
>> we doing it again here and in each op?
>
> Some ops gets called during clk_init which is before clk_register
> returns.
>
>

Hmm. Ok.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/