[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87vcb951t5.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 09:58:22 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, paul@...lmenage.org,
glommer@...allels.com, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mhocko@...e.cz,
bsingharora@...il.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] cpuset: cleanup cpuset[_can]_attach()
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> writes:
> Hello, Rusty.
>
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:17:11AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> > So, I guess this currently is caught in a place which isn't here or
>> > there. I'm pretty skeptical whether it makes sense to bother about
>> > static usages tho. Can I keep them for static ones?
>>
>> I didn't realize that cpuset_attach was a fastpath. If it is, put a
>
> It isn't a hot path. It's just a bit nasty to have to allocate them
> separately.
>
>> static there and I'll fix turn it into a bitmap when I need to.
>> Otherwise, please don't change the code in the first place.
>
> So, the plan to drop cpumask_t is still on? If so, I'll leave
> cpumask_var_t.
Yep!
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists