[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130107224308.GB27477@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:43:08 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine:
dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:35:57AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
>
> In commit 548860697046 ("dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree
> support") (which was changed since yesterday :-(), an instance of
> __devinit has been added. We are in the process of making CONFIG_HOTPLUG
> always true, and since commit 78d86c213f28 ("init.h: Remove __dev*
> sections from the kernel") (included in v3.7), __devinit does nothing.
> Please do not add any more.
That brings up something I wanted to ask you.
I'd like to send a patch to Linus to just delete __devinit and friends
entirely from init.h, but that will break the linux-next tree from
building in places (like this one, and in a few others.)
Is that ok? That should finally get everyone's attention and keep them
from the cargo-cult programming mode of using these attributes :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists