linux-kernel - RE: [v3 PATCH 06/12] spi/atmel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <B256D81BAE5131468A838E5D7A2436413A057056@penmbx02>
Date:	Tue, 8 Jan 2013 01:02:38 +0000
From:	"Yang, Wenyou" <Wenyou.Yang@...el.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Ferre, Nicolas" <Nicolas.FERRE@...el.com>,
	"plagnioj@...osoft.com" <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	"richard.genoud@...il.com" <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
	"Lin, JM" <JM.Lin@...el.com>,
	"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	"spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
	<spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [v3 PATCH 06/12] spi/atmel_spi: add dmaengine support



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@...ches.com]
> Sent: 2013年1月7日 10:10
> To: Yang, Wenyou
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Ferre,
> Nicolas; plagnioj@...osoft.com; richard.genoud@...il.com; Lin, JM;
> grant.likely@...retlab.ca; spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH 06/12] spi/atmel_spi: add dmaengine support
> 
> On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:50 +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
> > From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> []
> > +static inline bool atmel_spi_use_dma(struct atmel_spi *as,
> > +				struct spi_transfer *xfer)
> > +{
> > +	if ((as->use_dma) && (xfer->len >= DMA_MIN_BYTES))
> > +		return true;
> > +	else
> > +		return false;
> > +}
> 
> Same unnecessary form.
> 
> 	return as->use_dma && xfer->len >= DMA_MIN_BYTES;
> 
> > +static inline bool atmel_spi_use_pdc(struct atmel_spi *as)
> > +{
> > +	if (as->use_pdc)
> > +		return true;
> > +	else
> > +		return false;
> > +}
> 
> Does this function really need to exist at all?
> 
Thanks a lot for your advice.