[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMW5Ufb4LMPR86A7AMMeGzkcYzgGWVruGAQT6E7irAacZegzag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 11:19:25 -0500
From: Josh Coombs <josh.coombs@...il.com>
To: "Kim, Milo" <Milo.Kim@...com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
"cooloney@...il.com" <cooloney@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
"rpurdie@...ys.net" <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"jgarzik@...ox.com" <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
"linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow Marvell SATA driver to work with LEDS_TRIGGER_IDE_DISK
I'm testing a revised version of this patch that renames the trigger
to just 'disk' and updates all documentation and default_trigger
definitions to match. I'm also registering the trigger name
'ide-disk' for now so external tools/scripts/distros won't break while
a depreciation time is chosen.
Once I've verified this behaves on my system, I'm assuming a patch
that touches 25 files should be broken up? I'm thinking of submitting
in the following chunks:
ledtrig-ide-disk to ledtrig-disk
documentation updates
default-trigger updates
Marvell SATA adjusted to call the trigger
Any objections or comments on this plan of attack?
Josh C
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Kim, Milo <Milo.Kim@...com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linux-leds-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-leds-
>> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Jason Cooper
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 5:04 AM
>> To: Josh Coombs
>> Cc: cooloney@...il.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>> ide@...r.kernel.org; rpurdie@...ys.net; linux ARM; jgarzik@...ox.com;
>> linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow Marvell SATA driver to work with
>> LEDS_TRIGGER_IDE_DISK
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 02:18:04PM -0500, Josh Coombs wrote:
>> > Would it make more sense to add a second trigger
>> > for SATA instead?
>>
>> I'll leave that up to the led guys, I just wanted to raise the point
>> that the driver could logically support other types of disks, and we
>> should come up with a migration path instead of adding capabilities
>> ad-hoc.
>
> I agree with Jason's suggestion. One more thing to consider.
>
> If we replace the name, 'ide-disk' or 'ide_disk' with general one,
> then we should change the value of 'default_trigger' under arch directory also.
> LED trigger works if the name is matched with trigger name of LED device.
>
> Thanks,
> Milo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists