linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7u1 26/31] x86: Don't enable swiotlb if there is not enough ram for it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAE9FiQVo_RismQPa_js6NEbhMAAgREUkrzKJtkig8p9GxhZUVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Jan 2013 11:13:26 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Cc:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7u1 26/31] x86: Don't enable swiotlb if there is not
 enough ram for it

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com> wrote:
> After several revisions, I am loosing track. Could you please write a
> change log and explain the change to the existing behavior. If you
> could addresses the following areas, it will be easier figure if we
> are missing something (if any):
>
> 1. What happens when switolb is forced with iommu=soft on a system
> with and without not enough low mem?

panic later when device try to map_single with it.
instead of panic early during swiotlb allocation.

> 2. What happens when swiotlb is not forced, but iommu driver sets
> swiotlb=1 after it gets done with its iommu initialization on a system
> with and without enough low mem.

panic later when device try to map_single with it.
instead of panic early during swiotlb allocation.

> 3. What happens when nopanic is used and when will the system fail?
> Will it fail when driver runs into errors. I am hoping this won't be a
> silent failure. Please see more on this below:

according to eric/konrad, I make all use nopanic path,
and only mips, and x86-xen still panic early when
swiotlb_init_with_tab is called
directly.

hope mips, and x86-xen guys could convert to calling swiotlb_init instead.

>
> I did dma mapping error analysis a few months ago and found several
> drivers that don't check dma mapping errors, don't unmap dma buffers
> etc. Returning mapping error from switolb could cause problems when we
> have drivers that don't check mapping errors. These drivers might not
> fail cleanly either and could cause data corruption.

Now, we are using panic with them, later after those drivers get fixed, we
can change to returning MAP_ERROR instead.

>
> Here is a link to the dma mapping error analysis I did:
>
> http://linuxdriverproject.org/mediawiki/index.php/DMA_Mapping_Error_Analysis

good, looks like need one generic way to fix the problem, like another wrapper?

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/