[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1357758570.27076.8.camel@gitbox>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 08:09:30 +1300
From: Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: arm@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vt8500-wm8505-linux-kernel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia
WM8750/WM8850
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 22:30 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:20 +1300, Tony Prisk wrote:
> >> This patch adds support for the WM8750 (ARMv6) and WM8850 (ARMv7).
> >>
> >> Common features across all SoCs are split into ARCH_VT8500 and
> >> unique features are specified by each SoC option.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>
> >
> >
> > Hi Arnd, Olof,
> >
> > Haven't heard anything re: this patch series. Problem?
>
> Nope, just wasn't sure if you would send a git pull request or if you
> wanted them applied.
>
> I'm out of time for tonight, but I'll look closer at them (and apply
> them if all OK) tomorrow.
>
>
> -Olof
I'm quite happy to send a pull request if that's what you prefer.
Generally people have just taken the patches straight from email, so
everytime I've done a pull-request I get a reply back saying the patches
have already been applied.
Is there some 'rule' around pull-requests vs emailed patches?
Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already?
Regards
Tony P
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists