linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201301092127.05804.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Wed, 9 Jan 2013 21:27:05 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>
Cc:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, arm@...nel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	vt8500-wm8505-linux-kernel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850

On Wednesday 09 January 2013, Tony Prisk wrote:
> I'm quite happy to send a pull request if that's what you prefer.
> 
> Generally people have just taken the patches straight from email, so
> everytime I've done a pull-request I get a reply back saying the patches
> have already been applied.
> 
> Is there some 'rule' around pull-requests vs emailed patches?

Generally, pull requests tend to be less work for us, so I prefer
them. In particular, when you add a tag description or a signed
tag, that gives automatically puts  nice text into the merge
changeset.

> Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already?

Yes.

	Arnd

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/