lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130109225736.GA16735@liondog.tnic> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 23:57:36 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>, Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7u1 09/31] x86, 64bit: #PF handler set page to cover 2M only On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 04:48:29PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > Now #PF hanlder could map 1G per #PF, That causes same problem that > is fixed by > x86, mm: Only direct map addresses that are marked as E820_RAM > > only add one 2M mapping instead of 1G accessing one time for dynamically > per #PF. Ok, I can more or less grasp what the code does but this sentence above is a lot of fun. Do you mean: "add only one 2M mapping per #PF instead of all 512 pmds comprising 1G" ? Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists