[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQX-OxTzt3BPh3nSLQxDUBGR=eKob5AqXYzy=Lw9NYTaGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 13:15:06 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7u1 26/31] x86: Don't enable swiotlb if there is not
enough ram for it
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> writes:
>
>> please check updated attached. It should address all your request.
>
> There is one significant bug that I can see.
>
> swiotlb_print_info tests no_iotlb_memory but no_iotlb_memory is set
> after swiotlb_init_with_tlb returns.
there is another swiotlb_print_info calling from
pci_swiotlb_late_init
void __init pci_swiotlb_late_init(void)
{
/* An IOMMU turned us off. */
if (!swiotlb)
swiotlb_free();
else {
printk(KERN_INFO "PCI-DMA: "
"Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB)\n");
swiotlb_print_info();
}
}
so we need that checking when swiotlb == 1, but actually we can not
allocate that before.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists