[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130110125159.GQ20956@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:51:59 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, eric.y.miao@...il.com,
linux@....linux.org.uk, haojian.zhuang@...il.com,
chao.bi@...el.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] spi/pxa2xx: make clock rate configurable from
platform data
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:54:41PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 02:38:37 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > 3. We make the acpi_create_platform_device() match on, lets say
> > "INT33C" (a partial match), and in such case it assumes that we are
> > running on Lynxpoint. It will then create platform device for 'clk-lpt'.
> > 4. Now the clk-lpt driver creates the clocks.
> > 5. The SPI driver gets the clock it wants.
> That sounds reasonable to me. Mark, what do you think?
Sounds sensible, yes - about what I'd expect. Is it possible to match
on CPUID or similar information (given that this is all in the SoC)
instead of ACPI, that might be more robust I guess?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists