lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130110125159.GQ20956@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:51:59 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, eric.y.miao@...il.com,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, haojian.zhuang@...il.com,
	chao.bi@...el.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] spi/pxa2xx: make clock rate configurable from
 platform data

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:54:41PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 02:38:37 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:

> > 	3. We make the acpi_create_platform_device() match on, lets say
> > 	   "INT33C" (a partial match), and in such case it assumes that we are
> >            running on Lynxpoint. It will then create platform device for 'clk-lpt'.

> > 	4. Now the clk-lpt driver creates the clocks.

> > 	5. The SPI driver gets the clock it wants.

> That sounds reasonable to me.  Mark, what do you think?

Sounds sensible, yes - about what I'd expect.  Is it possible to match
on CPUID or similar information (given that this is all in the SoC)
instead of ACPI, that might be more robust I guess?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ