linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86,smp: make ticket spinlock proportional backoff w/ auto tuning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1357846213.5755.30.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:30:13 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aquini@...hat.com, walken@...gle.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, lwoodman@...hat.com, jeremy@...p.org,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>, knoel@...hat.com,
	chegu_vinod@...com, raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86,smp: make ticket spinlock proportional backoff
 w/ auto tuning

On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 10:31 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: 
> On 01/10/2013 10:19 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 17:26 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> >> Please let me know if you manage to break this code in any way,
> >> so I can fix it...
> >
> > I didn't break it, but did let it play with rq->lock contention.  Using
> > cyclictest -Smp99 -i 100 -d 0, with 3 rt tasks for pull_rt_task() to
> > pull around appears to have been a ~dead heat.
> 
> Good to hear that the code seems to be robust. It seems to
> help prevent performance degradation in some workloads, and
> nobody seems to have found regressions yet.

I had hoped for a bit of positive, but a wash isn't surprising given the
profile.  I tried tbench too, didn't expect to see anything at all
there, and got that.. so both results are positive in that respect.

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/