[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130110022722.GA1636@x61.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:27:23 -0200
From: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
walken@...gle.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, lwoodman@...hat.com,
jeremy@...p.org, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
knoel@...hat.com, chegu_vinod@...com, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86,smp: make ticket spinlock proportional backoff
w/ auto tuning
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 06:20:35PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> I ran kernbench on 32 core (mx3850) machine with 3.8-rc2 base.
> x base_3.8rc2
> + rik_backoff
> N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
> x 8 222.977 231.16 227.735 227.388 3.1512986
> + 8 218.75 232.347 229.1035 228.25425 4.2730225
> No difference proven at 95.0% confidence
I got similar results on smaller systems (1 socket, dual-cores and quad-cores)
when running Rik's latest series, no big difference for good nor for worse,
but I also think Rik's work is meant to address bigger systems with more cores
contending for any given spinlock.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists