[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50EE26B4.40204@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:25:56 +0800
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: rientjes@...gle.com, len.brown@...el.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
paulus@...ba.org, cl@...ux.com, minchan.kim@...il.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
wujianguo@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com, hpa@...or.com,
linfeng@...fujitsu.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com, mgorman@...e.de,
yinghai@...nel.org, glommer@...allels.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, cmetcalf@...era.com,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/15] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory()
for removing page table depends on architecture
Hi Andrew,
On 01/10/2013 06:50 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 17:32:29 +0800
> Tang Chen<tangchen@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> For removing memory, we need to remove page table. But it depends
>> on architecture. So the patch introduce arch_remove_memory() for
>> removing page table. Now it only calls __remove_pages().
>>
>> Note: __remove_pages() for some archtecuture is not implemented
>> (I don't know how to implement it for s390).
>
> Can this break the build for s390?
No, I don't think so. The arch_remove_memory() in s390 will only
return -EBUSY.
Thanks. :)
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists