lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130111145754.76BB53E08C3@localhost>
Date:	Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:57:54 +0000
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Jun Chen <jun.d.chen@...el.com>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bi Chao <chao.bi@...el.com>,
	spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, jun.zhang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Add the flag indicate to registe new device as children of master or not.

On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:16:52 -0500, Jun Chen <jun.d.chen@...el.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 19:06 +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> > The problem is that I don't understand why this change is necessary.
> > spi_devices should always be children of an spi_master, not siblings.
> > What is the problem you're trying to solve with this change?
> > 
> When spi drivers try to use the core function(spi_register_master),it
> will trigger error,because they use the function
> spi_match_master_to_boardinfo  to create new spi device as the children
> of the master.
> In the old version of spi core, the new devices are registered as
> siblings of the spi_master. My spi driver based on the old version runs
> normal.
> 
> But after applying for this patch:
> {
>     spi: Fix device unregistration when unregistering the bus master
>     
>     Device are added as children of the bus master's parent device, but
>     spi_unregister_master() looks for devices to unregister in the bus
>     master's children. This results in the child devices not being
>     unregistered.
>     
>     Fix this by registering devices as direct children of the bus
> master.
> 
> 
> -	spi->dev.parent = dev;
> +	spi->dev.parent = &master->dev;
> }
> 
> Then my driver will be crash.
> Maybe I have mistake on this issue, thank for your more explanation and
> detail replay. 

Sounds like you've got a driver bug. Make sure it isn't trying to use
the spi_client parent pointer to find the device instance.

g.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ