linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Cpufreq Fixes for 3.9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 12 Jan 2013 19:12:05 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
	patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Cpufreq Fixes for 3.9

On 12 January 2013 18:57, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> There's no need to add a Tested-by for yourself if you sign-off a patch,
> though.  Tested-by is information that somebody *in* *addition* to the
> original author has tested the patch, because we all should test the patches
> we sign-off, right?

Correct. I did it this time only, as it was something major.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/