lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAKohpon1uv1cXKJaOKQdw2_jLcOTABk86BYEicsHJjJ7Y1od_Q@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 19:12:05 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> Cc: cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Cpufreq Fixes for 3.9 On 12 January 2013 18:57, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote: > There's no need to add a Tested-by for yourself if you sign-off a patch, > though. Tested-by is information that somebody *in* *addition* to the > original author has tested the patch, because we all should test the patches > we sign-off, right? Correct. I did it this time only, as it was something major. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists