[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3417394.mgXgKYU9J9@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 14:27:25 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Cpufreq Fixes for 3.9
On Saturday, January 12, 2013 10:44:37 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> As requested, i am resending all my cpufreq fixes together. I have added correct
> Tested-by flags.
I have dropped the previous versions and applied this series instead.
There's no need to add a Tested-by for yourself if you sign-off a patch,
though. Tested-by is information that somebody *in* *addition* to the
original author has tested the patch, because we all should test the patches
we sign-off, right?
Rafael
> Viresh Kumar (5):
> cpufreq: Manage only online cpus
> cpufreq: Notify governors when cpus are hot-[un]plugged
> cpufreq: Don't use cpu removed during cpufreq_driver_unregister
> cpufreq: Simplify __cpufreq_remove_dev()
> cpufreq: Simplify cpufreq_add_dev()
>
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 316 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c | 27 +++-
> drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 9 ++
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 14 +-
> 4 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-)
>
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists