[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11530988.U26HMGnFLa@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 21:04:45 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@....de>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Andreas Müller <goo@...pelspeicher.org>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: fix new C-states not functional after AC disconnect
On Sunday, January 13, 2013 03:41:34 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 01/13/2013 01:34 PM, Thomas Schlichter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > there is a long-standing regression about new C-states not working after
> > disconnecting AC power from a laptop if the cpuidle driver "acpi-idle" is
> > used. It was reported here:
> >
> > [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42870 (March 5th 2012)
> > [2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43349 (June 7th 2012)
> > [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/16/518 (October 19th 2012)
> >
> > In [1] Andreas proposed a patch that initialized the missing power_usage
> > values from within acpi_idle in the same way as cpuidle does.
> > In [2] I proposed a patch to use the power values provided by ACPI to
> > initialize the power_usage variables.
> > In [3] Julius proposed a patch to call the initialization function
> > set_power_states() not only once, but always when the C-states change.
> >
> > Currently, Daniel Lezcano seems to be working on an intrusive change of not
> > using the power_usage value at all for choosing a C-state:
> >
> > [4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/14/155
> >
> > As I could not find any of these patches in any git trees to be merged for
> > 3.8, I propose an other, least intrusive patch for the time being. It is
> > attached an initializes _all_ power_usage values in the first place.
> >
> > As this is a real power consumption regression since 3.2, I really ask you to
> > apply anything and push it to stable, too!
>
> Rafael, is possible to apply the patch [1/2] I previously sent ?
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1878691/
I need to talk about this with Len. That should happen tomorrow if everything
goes well.
> So we get this bug fixed.
>
> I will resend the patch [2/2] as soon as possible.
OK
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists