[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50F2C79E.5000302@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:41:34 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@....de>
CC: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Andreas Müller
<goo@...pelspeicher.org>, Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: fix new C-states not functional after AC disconnect
On 01/13/2013 01:34 PM, Thomas Schlichter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is a long-standing regression about new C-states not working after
> disconnecting AC power from a laptop if the cpuidle driver "acpi-idle" is
> used. It was reported here:
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42870 (March 5th 2012)
> [2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43349 (June 7th 2012)
> [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/16/518 (October 19th 2012)
>
> In [1] Andreas proposed a patch that initialized the missing power_usage
> values from within acpi_idle in the same way as cpuidle does.
> In [2] I proposed a patch to use the power values provided by ACPI to
> initialize the power_usage variables.
> In [3] Julius proposed a patch to call the initialization function
> set_power_states() not only once, but always when the C-states change.
>
> Currently, Daniel Lezcano seems to be working on an intrusive change of not
> using the power_usage value at all for choosing a C-state:
>
> [4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/14/155
>
> As I could not find any of these patches in any git trees to be merged for
> 3.8, I propose an other, least intrusive patch for the time being. It is
> attached an initializes _all_ power_usage values in the first place.
>
> As this is a real power consumption regression since 3.2, I really ask you to
> apply anything and push it to stable, too!
Rafael, is possible to apply the patch [1/2] I previously sent ?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1878691/
So we get this bug fixed.
I will resend the patch [2/2] as soon as possible.
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists