| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:09:11 +0000 From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: Unique commit-id for "mm: compaction: [P,p]artially revert capture of suitable high-order page" On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:27:20PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 05:12:45PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> Hi Linus, > >> > >> I see two different commit-id for an identical patch (only subject > >> line differs). > >> [1] seems to be applied directly and [2] came with a merge of akpm-fixes. > >> What is in case of backports for -stable kernels? > > > > I do not expect it to matter. I was going to use > > 8fb74b9fb2b182d54beee592350d9ea1f325917a as the commit ID whenever I got > > the complaint mail from Greg's tools about a 3.7 merge failure. The 3.7.2 > > backport looks like this. > > > > Oh cool and thanks! > Are you planning to resend this backport-patch to the lists w/ a "3.7" > (or for-3.7) in the commit-subject? > Yes, when I get the reject mail from Greg's tools. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists