[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130114170134.GA26655@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:01:34 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Unique commit-id for "mm: compaction: [P,p]artially revert
capture of suitable high-order page"
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 01:09:11PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:27:20PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 05:12:45PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > >> Hi Linus,
> > >>
> > >> I see two different commit-id for an identical patch (only subject
> > >> line differs).
> > >> [1] seems to be applied directly and [2] came with a merge of akpm-fixes.
> > >> What is in case of backports for -stable kernels?
> > >
> > > I do not expect it to matter. I was going to use
> > > 8fb74b9fb2b182d54beee592350d9ea1f325917a as the commit ID whenever I got
> > > the complaint mail from Greg's tools about a 3.7 merge failure. The 3.7.2
> > > backport looks like this.
> > >
> >
> > Oh cool and thanks!
> > Are you planning to resend this backport-patch to the lists w/ a "3.7"
> > (or for-3.7) in the commit-subject?
> >
>
> Yes, when I get the reject mail from Greg's tools.
You should have that rejection email now :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists