[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1358700917.2406.93.camel@falcor1.watson.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:55:17 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, pjones@...hat.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
jwboyer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] binfmt_elf: Verify signature of signed elf binary
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 08:17 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> You then get into issues like: do we have to ban prelink as a result?
Once you change a file, the original signature shouldn't match. If you
really trust prelink, then make prelink a trusted application that can
resign the modified file. How to create/store/use private keys on the
target system is a separate issue.
thanks,
Mimi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists