linux-kernel - Re: [PULL] kms locking rework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKMK7uG7no98LGGEZ1nH=6V6HPgYZeZaJE8Jmo_np4DDZtwJ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:24:28 +0100
From:	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
To:	sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL] kms locking rework

On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I am testing your patchset (original postings at [1]).
> At a 1st look it seems to be OK.
> Any tests you want me to run?

Imo the fundamentals of the series are well-tested with the i-g-t
series, so running things on as many (non-i915) gpus as possible is
the most interesting thing. I just don't have that many radeon/nouveau
machines lying around for that ...

If you want to get really fancy, set up a zaphod dual-head config with
2 independent X servers to check whether concurrent pageflips don't
cause havoc. That needs something which pageflips, ofc.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/