| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CA+icZUUsqejwefNPpApMyLCf5u5fd3pKUrGGQDCQGOghMah_Vg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:43:02 +0100 From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org> Subject: Re: [PULL] kms locking rework On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> I am testing your patchset (original postings at [1]). >> At a 1st look it seems to be OK. >> Any tests you want me to run? > > Imo the fundamentals of the series are well-tested with the i-g-t > series, so running things on as many (non-i915) gpus as possible is > the most interesting thing. I just don't have that many radeon/nouveau > machines lying around for that ... > I am here on SNB, so. > If you want to get really fancy, set up a zaphod dual-head config with > 2 independent X servers to check whether concurrent pageflips don't > cause havoc. That needs something which pageflips, ofc. Sounds like a lot of work... Any docs/wiki around to manage such a setup? - Sedat - > -Daniel > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists