[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBSQuJ1YWmp-MmYjsm-D-PBZT7FRZM2ttbG06GEYAnJF6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:08:12 +0100
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] perf stat: add interval printing
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi Stephane,
>
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:38:29 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> AFAICS the only caller of print_stat() is cmd_stat() and it'll call this
>>> only if interval is 0. So why not just setting prefix to NULL then?
>>>
>> I don't understand your point here. Prefix is set ONLY when interval
>> is non zero. Prefix is setup before print_counter() so that each counter
>> for each interval is timestamped with the same value.
>
> Please see below.
>
>
>>>> - if (status != -1)
>>>> + if (status != -1 && !interval)
>>>> print_stat(argc, argv);
>
> Here, print_stat() is called only if interval is 0. So no need to check
> the interval inside the print_stat(), right?
>
Ok, got it. Due to some leftover code. Will fix in V6.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists