[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87txq9kdw3.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:03:40 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo\@elte.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"ak\@linux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] perf stat: add interval printing
Hi Stephane,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:38:29 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>> AFAICS the only caller of print_stat() is cmd_stat() and it'll call this
>> only if interval is 0. So why not just setting prefix to NULL then?
>>
> I don't understand your point here. Prefix is set ONLY when interval
> is non zero. Prefix is setup before print_counter() so that each counter
> for each interval is timestamped with the same value.
Please see below.
>>> - if (status != -1)
>>> + if (status != -1 && !interval)
>>> print_stat(argc, argv);
Here, print_stat() is called only if interval is 0. So no need to check
the interval inside the print_stat(), right?
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists