linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 23/24] ab8500-bm: Fix minor niggles experienced during testing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130123081650.GE15873@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:16:50 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	arnd@...db.de, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/24] ab8500-bm: Fix minor niggles experienced during
 testing

On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Anton Vorontsov wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:27:17AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Jan 2013, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:03:59PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > When compile testing the new AB8500 Battery Management changes
> > > > due for inclusion into upstream, there were a few minor niggles
> > > > which required repairing, or adapting for use against the
> > > > Mainline kernel. This patch is a collection of them all.
> > > 
> > > No. This is the third time I'm saying it: the last time I checked, this is
> > > not how we do development in the mainline.
> > 
> > Okay, all of these changes have now been fixed-up into the patches
> > which caused the issues. I have also added Stable to the patch you
> > requested it on.
> > 
> > How would you like to proceed? Do you want a pull-request, or for me
> > to send the patches to the list again?
> 
> Either way will work.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Anton
> 
> p.s. I took another look at the patches, and noticed one issue that is
> constantly there: you place your signed-off-by line on top of everyones',
> but that's wrong. Sign offs are going downwards, not upwards. This is
> quite important since the lines encode how the code "travels" between
> companies and submitters. Currently, one might assume that the origin of
> the code is always Linaro, which is not quite true. (And 'From:' doesn't
> always mean the author, fwiw.)

Thanks for the info. I'll move them all and re-submit.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/