linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] regulator: Display in use regulators in sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130123081927.GF15873@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:19:27 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] regulator: Display in use regulators in sysfs

On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:46:24AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> > To locate a consumer that currently holds a regulattor, a new sysfs
> > entry is created. The consumer are published in
> > /sys/class/regulator/regulator.<#>/use.
> 
> We call our reference counts use count but this was in fact the original
> design, the local reference counts got dropped due to David Brownell's
> forceful insistance :/

So I should pull the patch?

How do you feel about being able to access it via sysfs? Good or bad
idea? If it's a good idea, I can always change the name of the
variable?

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/