[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A93EA911BF@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:27:21 +0000
From: "Mohammed, Afzal" <afzal@...com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Koen Kooi <koen@...inion.thruhere.net>
CC: "linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>,
"Valkeinen, Tomi" <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 00/12] video: da8xx-fb: am335x DT support
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 00:15:09, Rob Clark wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better to delete da8xx-fb.* and switch to Rob Clarks DRM based driver for this IP block?
> we probably can't delete da8xx-fb, but I think it would be ok to only
> use it for legacy platforms not yet ported to DT.
We can't remove da8xx-fb as DA830 is a non-DT one and DA850 is only gaining
DT support.
And Rob,
I am not familiar with drm setup, would all the user space frame buffer based
applications work as is with drm driver?
Regards
Afzal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists