lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1358949553-30309-2-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:59:13 +0800
From:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:	davem@...emloft.net, mst@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tuntap: limit the number of flow caches

We create new flow caches when a new flow is identified by tuntap, This may lead
some issues:

- userspace may produce a huge amount of short live flows to exhaust host memory
- the unlimited number of flow caches may produce a long list which increase the
  time in the linear searching

Solve this by introducing a limit of total number of flow caches.

Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/net/tun.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index 8939d21..cc09b67 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ struct tap_filter {
  * the netdevice to be fit in one page. So we can make sure the success of
  * memory allocation. TODO: increase the limit. */
 #define MAX_TAP_QUEUES DEFAULT_MAX_NUM_RSS_QUEUES
+#define MAX_TAP_FLOWS  4096
 
 #define TUN_FLOW_EXPIRE (3 * HZ)
 
@@ -185,6 +186,7 @@ struct tun_struct {
 	unsigned int numdisabled;
 	struct list_head disabled;
 	void *security;
+	u32 flow_count;
 };
 
 static inline u32 tun_hashfn(u32 rxhash)
@@ -218,6 +220,7 @@ static struct tun_flow_entry *tun_flow_create(struct tun_struct *tun,
 		e->queue_index = queue_index;
 		e->tun = tun;
 		hlist_add_head_rcu(&e->hash_link, head);
+		++tun->flow_count;
 	}
 	return e;
 }
@@ -228,6 +231,7 @@ static void tun_flow_delete(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_flow_entry *e)
 		  e->rxhash, e->queue_index);
 	hlist_del_rcu(&e->hash_link);
 	kfree_rcu(e, rcu);
+	--tun->flow_count;
 }
 
 static void tun_flow_flush(struct tun_struct *tun)
@@ -317,7 +321,8 @@ static void tun_flow_update(struct tun_struct *tun, u32 rxhash,
 		e->updated = jiffies;
 	} else {
 		spin_lock_bh(&tun->lock);
-		if (!tun_flow_find(head, rxhash))
+		if (!tun_flow_find(head, rxhash) &&
+		    tun->flow_count < MAX_TAP_FLOWS)
 			tun_flow_create(tun, head, rxhash, queue_index);
 
 		if (!timer_pending(&tun->flow_gc_timer))
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ