[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130123160354.GE4565@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:03:59 +0800
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@...tcummins.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Dajun Chen <dchen@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v1 2/5] regulator: da9055 change irq state to default
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:05:12PM +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > What makes you say that there is a dependency here? It's really not at
> > all obvious why a change to the primary IRQ signalling mechanism would
> > affect the internal interrupts of the device.
> Yes, functionally this dependency should not matter.However, if
> mfd/primary irq state is low and its components are high then it shall
> not look good. Therefore the term dependency was used, probably I should
> have written it in a different manner.
This logic doesn't follow terribly directly - looking at what you've
posted it in fact seems that the trigger type is irrelevant in the
function drivers?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists