[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1359017171.18561.29.camel@suxuemin.sh.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:46:11 +0800
From: "Su, Xuemin" <xuemin.su@...el.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: airlied@...ux.ie, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com,
bo.he@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] drm_crtc: check if fb_create return NULL
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 10:31 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > }
> > + /* some buggy driver may return NULL here, which may cause panic */
> > + BUG_ON(!fb);
>
> I fail to see the benefit of this compared to just letting it oops...
>
> > or->fb_id = fb->base.id;
>
> ...right here.
>
>
For PATCH V3, I think a BUG_ON may give the user clearer information
about the reason of panic. Easier to debug.
I submitted a PATCH V2 yesterday which gives a warning and then return
-EVAL if fb==NULL, preventing the panic. Do you think this is
acceptable?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists