linux-kernel - Re: sched: Consequences of integrating the Per Entity Load Tracking Metric into the Load Balancer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5100A6F7.4080109@intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:13:59 +0800
From:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC:	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
	Paul McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Venki Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
	Robin Randhawa <robin.randhawa@....com>,
	Lists linaro-dev <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: sched: Consequences of integrating the Per Entity Load Tracking
 Metric into the Load Balancer


>>
>> Maybe we can skip local group since it's a bottom-up search so we know
>> there's no idle cpu in the lower domain from the prior iteration.
>>
> 
> I did this change but seems results are worse on my machines, guess start seeking idle cpu bottom up is a bad idea.
> The following is full version with above change.
> 

also tried to keep top-down seeking mode, and will return any idle cpu
instead of the first cpu in a idle group. But the result doesn't show
better on benchmark hackbench.

===
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 5eea870..fb85094 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3169,6 +3169,7 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd,
struct task_struct *p, int sync)
  		return 1;
 	}
+	/* bias toward prev cpu */
 	return 0;
 }
 @@ -3252,7 +3253,8 @@ find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_group *group, struct
task_struct *p, int this_cpu)
 /*
  * Try and locate an idle CPU in the sched_domain.
  */
-static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target)
+static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p,
+				struct sched_domain *affine_sd, int sync)
 {
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	int prev_cpu = task_cpu(p);
@@ -3264,20 +3266,23 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct
task_struct *p, int target)
 	 * If the task is going to be woken-up on this cpu and if it is
 	 * already idle, then it is the right target.
 	 */
-	if (target == cpu && idle_cpu(cpu))
+	if (idle_cpu(cpu))
 		return cpu;
  	/*
 	 * If the task is going to be woken-up on the cpu where it previously
 	 * ran and if it is currently idle, then it the right target.
 	 */
-	if (target == prev_cpu && idle_cpu(prev_cpu))
+	if (cpu != prev_cpu && idle_cpu(prev_cpu))
 		return prev_cpu;
 +	if (cpu != prev_cpu && !wake_affine(affine_sd, p, sync))
+		cpu = prev_cpu;
+
 	/*
 	 * Otherwise, iterate the domains and find an elegible idle cpu.
 	 */
-	sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, target));
+	sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu));
 	for_each_lower_domain(sd) {
 		sg = sd->groups;
 		do {
@@ -3290,7 +3295,7 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct
*p, int target)
 					goto next;
 			}
 -			target = cpumask_first_and(sched_group_cpus(sg),
+			cpu = cpumask_first_and(sched_group_cpus(sg),
 					tsk_cpus_allowed(p));
 			goto done;
 next:
@@ -3298,7 +3303,7 @@ next:
 		} while (sg != sd->groups);
 	}
 done:
-	return target;
+	return cpu;
 }
  /*
@@ -3351,10 +3356,7 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int
sd_flag, int wake_flags)
 	}
  	if (affine_sd) {
-		if (cpu != prev_cpu && wake_affine(affine_sd, p, sync))
-			prev_cpu = cpu;
-
-		new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, prev_cpu);
+		new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, affine_sd, sync);
 		goto unlock;
 	}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/