linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] tuntap: limit the number of flow caches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5100A90C.2030406@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:22:52 +0800
From:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	mst@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tuntap: limit the number of flow caches

On 01/24/2013 02:50 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:59:13 +0800
>
>> We create new flow caches when a new flow is identified by tuntap, This may lead
>> some issues:
>>
>> - userspace may produce a huge amount of short live flows to exhaust host memory
>> - the unlimited number of flow caches may produce a long list which increase the
>>   time in the linear searching
>>
>> Solve this by introducing a limit of total number of flow caches.
>>
>> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>> ---
> Applied, but really flow caches are an extremely broken concept especially
> when external entities control the population of such caches.
>
> We removed the routing cache of the ipv4 networking code exactly because
> this kind of crap does not work at all.
>
> Next you're going to have to add a delicately managed garbage
> collection scheme for this tuntap flow cache, and that will be tuned
> endlessly, when the real issue is that fundamentally this does not
> work.
>
> Instead, make the full lookup scale properly and use appropriate data
> structures.  It won't be as fast as a simple hash table demux, but
> it'll actually be immune to growth issues and DoS attacks and give
> consistent and repeatable lookup performance regardless of traffic
> patterns.

Ok, I will rework it in 3.9.

Thanks
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/