[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpo=WUS6cjce70v_UvAfhTcW1RKHFYU3EPMjY8Z-+1kic5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:09:25 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
spear-devel <spear-devel@...t.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3.5] dw_dmac: return proper residue value
On 25 January 2013 15:07, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> Yeah, the keyword is "look". 1 per million cases it could be true. I
> think this discussion is going to the dead end.
> Anyone else would like to argue for one or the other opinion?
>
> I might obey your way with the commentary that with quite lower
> possibility we could have an issue there.
:)
Okay, lets keep your version.
@Vinod: you are free to pick these patches now ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists