linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] fuse: An attempt to implement a write-back cache policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJfpegsp5_Mges1NAZbPSn-q+0O_EgJyroQsf-Vjy20O8DmfLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:21:13 +0100
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	"Maxim V. Patlasov" <mpatlasov@...allels.com>
Cc:	Kirill Korotaev <dev@...allels.com>,
	"fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" <fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
	"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] fuse: An attempt to implement a write-back cache policy

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Maxim V. Patlasov
<mpatlasov@...allels.com> wrote:
> Heard nothing from you for two months. Any feedback would still be
> appreciated.

Sorry about the long silence.

I haven't done a detailed review yet.  It would be good if you could
resent the patchset against for-next branch of the fuse tree.

I see that you have some other patchsets pending.   Are they independent?

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/