lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8yak3r15ds0.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:16:31 -0800
From:	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...t.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
	Daniel Walker <c_dwalke@...cinc.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/19] ARM: msm: proc_comm_boot_wait should not be __init

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:

> msm_smd_probe is a driver probe function and may get
> called after the __init time, so it must not call
> any __init function, as the link-time warning reports.
> Take away the __init annotation on proc_comm_boot_wait
> to fix this.
>
> Without this patch, building msm_defconfig results in:
>
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0xb048): Section mismatch in reference from the function msm_smd_probe() to the function .init.text:proc_comm_boot_wait()
> The function msm_smd_probe() references
> the function __init proc_comm_boot_wait().
> This is often because msm_smd_probe lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of proc_comm_boot_wait is wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: Daniel Walker <c_dwalke@...cinc.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-msm/proc_comm.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Arnd, you're welcome to pull this into your tree:
Acked-by: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>

I don't forsee any conflicts with upcoming patches.

David

-- 
sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ