[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130127130259.GC3933@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:02:59 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] perf: Adding better precise_ip field handling
* Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 01:41:33PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > hi,
> > > adding sysfs attribute to specify the maximum allowed value
> > > for perf_event_attr::precise_ip field.
> > >
> > > Adding functionality for simple 'precise' term to get the
> > > maximum allowed value for perf_event_attr::precise_ip field.
> > >
> > > And finally adding several precise automated tests.
> >
> > Ok - could we please as a next step turn on cycles:pp as the
> > default in all the profiling tools (perf record, perf top),
> > transparently? I.e. if the CPU supports it then use it, if not
> > then don't complain, just use the highest grade profiling method
> > available.
>
> yep, we discussed with Arnaldo this would be good to have
This would be a high-profile, user visible improvement to
profiling quality.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists