lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:04:40 -0800 From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com> To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aquini@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, lwoodman@...hat.com, knoel@...hat.com, chegu_vinod@...com, raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4 4/5] x86,smp: keep spinlock delay values per hashed spinlock address On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote: > + u32 delay = (ent->hash == hash) ? ent->delay : MIN_SPINLOCK_DELAY; I still don't like the reseting of delay to MIN_SPINLOCK_DELAY when there is a hash collision. -- Michel "Walken" Lespinasse A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists