[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130128154407.16a623a4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:44:07 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Petr Holasek <pholasek@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@...ellosystems.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/11] ksm: remove old stable nodes more thoroughly
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:01:59 -0800 (PST)
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
> +static int remove_all_stable_nodes(void)
> +{
> + struct stable_node *stable_node;
> + int nid;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + for (nid = 0; nid < nr_node_ids; nid++) {
> + while (root_stable_tree[nid].rb_node) {
> + stable_node = rb_entry(root_stable_tree[nid].rb_node,
> + struct stable_node, node);
> + if (remove_stable_node(stable_node)) {
> + err = -EBUSY;
It's a bit rude to overwrite remove_stable_node()'s return value.
> + break; /* proceed to next nid */
> + }
> + cond_resched();
Why is this here?
> + }
> + }
> + return err;
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists