linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Secure Boot: More controversial changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 29 Jan 2013 04:40:13 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Secure Boot: More controversial changes

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 06:05:56PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> These at the very least need some kind of CONFIG_WEAK_SECURE_BOOT
> option or something like that.

Given Eric's views on the kexec patch (and given that there's no point 
in the hibernate one if kexec's available...), I'm not planning on 
pushing these until there's a plausible story for limiting kexec to 
signed images.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/