linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] CMAC support for CryptoAPI, fixed patch issues, indent, and testmgr build issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130129093331.GA23291@secunet.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:33:31 +0100
From:	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:	Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@...et.fi>
Cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	Tom St Denis <tstdenis@...iptictech.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CMAC support for CryptoAPI, fixed patch issues, indent,
 and testmgr build issues

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 01:25:46PM +0200, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
> 
> Maybe it would be cleaner to not mess with pfkeyv2.h at all, but instead mark algorithms that do not support pfkey with flag. See patch below.
> 

As nobody seems to have another opinion, we could go either with your
approach, or we can invert the logic and mark all existing algorithms
as pfkey supported. Then we would not need to bother about pfkey again.

I'd be fine with both. Do you want to submit a patch?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/