linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] CMAC support for CryptoAPI, fixed patch issues, indent, and testmgr build issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130131113516.96632or3s6s22bwg@www.dalek.fi>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:35:16 +0200
From:	Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@...et.fi>
To:	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	Tom St Denis <tstdenis@...iptictech.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CMAC support for CryptoAPI, fixed patch issues,
 indent, and testmgr build issues

Quoting Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>:

> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 01:25:46PM +0200, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
>>
>> Maybe it would be cleaner to not mess with pfkeyv2.h at all, but  
>> instead mark algorithms that do not support pfkey with flag. See  
>> patch below.
>>
>
> As nobody seems to have another opinion, we could go either with your
> approach, or we can invert the logic and mark all existing algorithms
> as pfkey supported. Then we would not need to bother about pfkey again.
>
> I'd be fine with both. Do you want to submit a patch?
>

Ok, I'll invert the logic and send new patch.

-Jussi



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/