[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87txpznkog.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:23:43 +0100
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To: Daniele Palmas <dnlplm@...il.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Matthias Urlichs <smurf@...rf.noris.de>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] USB: option: add support for Telit LE920
Daniele Palmas <dnlplm@...il.com> writes:
> The output of lsusb for interface #1 is the following:
>
> Interface Descriptor:
> bLength 9
> bDescriptorType 4
> bInterfaceNumber 1
> bAlternateSetting 0
> bNumEndpoints 2
> bInterfaceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class
> bInterfaceSubClass 66
> bInterfaceProtocol 1
> iInterface 0
>
> It should be an adb device, so probably it is not needed to blacklist
> it. Should I resend a new patch with only interface #5 reserved?
You could have used USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO() matching on all
ff/ff/ff to avoid blacklisting the adb interface, but IMHO the patch is
fine as it is.
This being an Android device raises another question though: Are these
interface numbers static? I assume you can e.g. disable adb? What
happens to the descriptors then? Does the device change pid, or are the
interfaces renumbered?
Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists