[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130131054002.GA3697@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 06:40:02 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: circular locking dependency detected
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:26:53AM +1100, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Which may or may not be a good thing depending how you look at it; it
> > means that once your kernel blanks, you get a lockdep dump. At that
> > point you lose lockdep checking for everything else because lockdep
> > disables itself after the first dump.
>
> Fair enough, we may want to revert the lockdep checking for
> console_lock, and make re-enabling it part of the patch-series that
> fixes the locking.
>
> Daniel/Dave? Does that sound reasonable?
Reverting the patch is fine with me. Just let me know so I can queue it
up again for 3.9.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists